One of my biggest beefs with the patent system, particularly in tech, is the fact that often there is prior art.
I read this thread on groklaw about the Apple/Samsung decision and the issue of prior art is raised but I am confused about it.
What I would love to know is if the jurors evaluated the prior art issues in their deliberations or whether they punted on them.
Does anyone have any clarity on this?
Read more posts on A VC »